
Send email to freebsd-javaFreeBSD.org.Compiling and linking can be combined into one step: weiqigao gcj -mainHello -o Hello Hello.java compile and link. For example, Sun’s Java HotSpot Virtual Machine 1.4.2 for PowerPC includes a just-in-time compiler that achieves an impres-sivespeedupofover1500comparedtopureinterpretation. How-ever, this comes at the price of a total VM size of approximately 7MB, of which about 90 can be attributed to the just-in-time compiler.Mac OS X 10.7, the latest version of Apple’s desktop operating system dubbed Lion, has dropped support for several elements that help make up the OS X experience today.The instructions in this listing work on a PowerPC processor running Linux.data msg. Global start start: li 0.A C compiler should be enough to build it. GCC would be my second bet, it certainly handled PowerPC (Linus Torvalds had a G3 Mac as his primary development machine at some point, IIRC).

Compile Java For Powerpc Code To Machine
Let's take Java for example.When Java was designed, it was clear that Java programs were always going to be run on the JVM. The compiler would simply convert the source code to machine code, and the interpreter would simply execute the source code (or some IL produced by a compiler).However, I'm not sure about languages with garbage collection. In most cases, it is possible to create both a native compiler and an interpreter for a programming language.
After all, most real-world implementations of Java are static compilers anyway.Even C and C++ need a runtime library. Every language can be implemented with a compiler and every language can be implemented with an interpreter. It doesn't matter whether it's a compiler, an interpreter or a mixed-mode implementation. Exist, it is obviously possible.Whether or not a language is "managed" is a question of language semantics, not the implementation. And the machine itself doesn't feature a mechanism for garbage collection.How would someone implementing a native Java compiler deal with this situation? Is it possible to create a native compiler for Java, since the Java design 'counts' on automatic garbage collection? (And possibly on some additional things the VM does for the program?)Since native compilers for Java, C# etc. So while designing the Java language itself, there was no need for destructors and such.If one was going to implement a native Java compiler, that would mean the Java source code would be compiled to machine code to be run on the machine itself, not on a VM.
...
